For those of us who live at the shoreline
standing upon the constant edges of decision
crucial and alone
for those of us who cannot indulge
the passing dreams of choice
who love in doorways coming and going
in the hours between dawns
looking inward and outward
at once before and after
seeking a now that can breed
futures
like bread in our children’s mouths
so their dreams will not reflect
the death of ours
***
For those of us
who were imprinted with fear
like a faint line in the center of our foreheads
learning to be afraid with our mother’s milk
for by this weapon
this illusion of some safety to be found
the heavy-footed hoped to silence us
For all of us
this instant and this triumph
We were never meant to survive.
***
And when the sun rises we are afraid
it might not remain
when the sun sets we are afraid
it might not rise in the morning
when our stomachs are full we are afraid
of indigestion
when our stomachs are empty we are afraid
we may never eat again
when we are loved we are afraid
love with vanish
when we are alone we are afraid
love will never return
and when we speak we are afraid
our words will not be heard
nor welcomed
but when we are silent
we are still afraid.
***
So it is better to speak
remembering
we were never meant to survive.
*In honor of Denver PrideFest, which I write about on Tuesday. This is one of my favorite poems. I suppose it sounds a bit depressing, but I read it as a call to action.
a street on Capitol Hill (on Sherman, between 10th and 11th) featuring 9 old buildings named after writers, not all of whom are known as poets. I noticed that the Robert Frost building
is up the street from the Beauvallon in the Golden Triangle.
I see a similarity in the style of the window gratings, but can that one detail be used as the basis for a poet-to-building comparison? In other words, do you think there is any way in which Robert Frost’s poetry resembles this monstrously beige building? Poets.org calls Frost (1874–1963) “a quintessentially modern poet in his adherence to language as it is actually spoken, in the psychological complexity of his portraits, and in the degree to which his work is infused with layers of ambiguity and irony.” I’m not sure I would call the Beauvallon modern, but I could accuse it of having layers, I suppose.
complaint about “scribbling women” taking away book sales from more deserving writers. Searching for that phrase on Google led me to
“not a grower—he was a builder. He built poems: he didn’t put in the seed, and water the seed, and send down his sun—letting the rest take care of itself: he measured his poems—kept them within formula.” Is it inappropriate that the doorway of a “builder” is dappled with the shadows of leaves?
because at least that would make me laugh: “Always acknowledge a fault. This will throw those in authority off their guard and give you an opportunity to commit more.”
Casas naufragadas, perdidas
—Heberto Padilla



No brigadier throughout the year